tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15921510.post7348060487045392165..comments2023-05-03T06:04:41.057-05:00Comments on Cumberland Island: Contraception Versus Evolution?Adrian C. Keisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12601165797762278028noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15921510.post-30837715522042929442009-03-02T09:34:00.000-05:002009-03-02T09:34:00.000-05:00Quite. Isn't it intellectually satisfying that Chr...Quite. Isn't it intellectually satisfying that Christianity has no contradictions? "Our hearts are restless until they find their rest in Thee." - Augustine.Adrian C. Keisterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12601165797762278028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15921510.post-82376987592347327182009-02-23T22:07:00.000-05:002009-02-23T22:07:00.000-05:00I would think the very existence and widespread us...I would think the very existence and widespread use of contraception would mess up the whole evolutionary process. The idea of evolution is that those who are most fit for survival will live longer and have more offspring, therefore causing their genes to become more prominent in the next generation. Today however, the most successful people (by society's standards anyway) are using birth control and limiting their reproduction to one or two children at the most. Either birth control prevents evolution or evolution disagrees with our society's standards of success. If evolution theory holds true, then those of us who choose to focus on being parents and having large families rather than making and enjoying lots of money must be genetically superior :-)Beth M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/05892053673572485640noreply@blogger.com